Acts 2:22-24
Men of Israel, hear these words. Jesus the Nazarene, was a man having been
demonstrated into you as being from God by powers and wonders and signs – which
God made through him in your midst, just as you have known. Through a hand of lawlessness after affixing
to a cross you all murdered this man delivered up by the purpose and
foreknowledge of God which has been definitively set; whom God raised after
unbinding the pangs of death, inasmuch as it was not powerful enough under him
to firmly grasp him.
Thoughts for Today:
First Thought:
Jesus had lived and breathed among the people to whom Peter
now speaks. In some respects, it is
tough to talk about the faith now because we’ve never really seen Jesus
physically face to face – we’ve only seen the fruit of His Spirit. On the other hand, Peter knows that these are
the very people who wanted to see Jesus dead.
Do you think it is easier to talk to people about the
benefits of something they’ve never experienced or to talk to people about the
benefits of something they’ve experienced and hated it enough to end it? Why?
Second Thought:
Peter is pretty bold here.
It takes some guts to look someone in the face and remind them that they
are directly responsible for killing Jesus.
Peter is potentially putting his neck on the chopping block.
Do you think this is a good approach for Peter to take? What is the benefit of confronting people
with the consequences of their actions?
What are the potential hazards of confronting people with the
consequences?
Third Thought:
Here Peter confesses to believing that Jesus was raised from
the dead. We do the same thing every
time we worship God on Sunday. But let’s
think about this. If you met someone who
claimed to have been dead for 3 days but suddenly made alive – would you
believe them?
In what way does our claim to believe in the resurrection
make our faith unbelievable to the world around us? Is this necessarily a bad thing? What does believing in something “impossible”
prove to the world?
Passage for Tomorrow: Acts 2:25-32
3 comments:
I do have to say I love Peter's blunt attitude in this story. He had to have some major confidence to speak in front of these people. I am not really sure if it would be easier to talk to people today or people back then...possibly more so back then because they had seen what Jesus did. Now people are so against the wordand Jesus' teachings. Its almost like this quote I saw that was something along the lines of its discrimination unless your Christian ...and now I'm rambling haha anyways easier maybe back then
Yeah, in the end I think that's where I have to go, too. Even though these people had Jesus arrested and crucified ... at least they had seen Him face to face.
As for the bluntness, wait until we meet this guy named Stephen. you might like him so much that you'll change your name to Stephanie! LOL
Haha I can't wait :)
Post a Comment