Summary retelling of Acts 19:35-41
A
town manager got up to speak to the assembled crowd. The manager basically said that everyone
knows that Ephesus is the city of Artemis and no single person is going to be
able to take away that designation. He
then adds that they haven’t even brought anyone with them who has said things
against Artemis. The town manager then
reminds Demetrius and any others that if they have a legitimate complaint
against anyone that they should take it through the court system which is
always open to legitimate lawsuits. The
manager reminds the crowd that they have procedures for dealing with complaints
and should they continue to behave as they are behaving that they will be in
danger of rioting without cause. With
that, he told everyone to go home.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
To
really understand the manager’s position, we need to understand how the Roman
system worked. Rome came into an area
and conquered it militarily. Most cities
would sue for terms of peace rather than fight the Roman soldiers. Those cities would essentially be told that
so long as they pay a tribute to Rome and live according to Roman rule that
they could continue to manage themselves.
However, if there was any indication that they could not successfully
manage themselves, the Romans would station soldiers in this city to keep peace
and make sure that the tribute comes regularly.
Once Roman soldiers were stationed in a city, there would be a Roman
governor appointed, official tax collectors, and there would be very little individual
freedom.
In
what respect can we see this process similar to God’s giving free will to all
humanity? How does knowing this history make
the town manager’s words about rioting make far more sense? What is the manager really trying to protect
when he speaks?
Second Thought:
The
town manager is quick to show the crowd that they are in fault. They have a process and a procedure for
dealing with legal cases like Demetrius had against Paul. The manager knows that in addition to fearing
Roman intervention he needs to fear any group of people that is so fired up to
circumvent society’s appointed regulations for accomplishing legal cases like
this. There are times and places for
rioting – but only when the system in place is completely broken and incapable
of being trusted. Mobs are good at
anarchy and overturning corrupt regimes.
Even then, mobs are never good at handing out legitimate justice and
establishing legitimate patterns of rule.
How
does this understanding help us to really grasp the dangers of mob mentality?
Third Thought:
You
have to give credit to the town manager for continuing to be a voice of
reason. The crowd was on the verge of
rioting. They were enthralled with the
excitement. They were primed for action –
any action. It would have been easy for
the town manager to get caught up in that emotion. But he doesn’t. He stays calm.
How
do you think the town manager was able to keep his head about him while
everyone else was rioting? What do you
need to do to be able to keep your head about you during times where it is easy
to get caught up in the emotional response?
Passage for Tomorrow: Acts 20:1-6
No comments:
Post a Comment