Summary retelling of Acts 22:30-23:5
The
military leader wants to know the real reason that Paul was being beaten in the
temple, so he orders the Sanhedrin to gather and he brings Paul there. Paul begins by addressing the Sanhedrin and
saying that he has lived in good conscience according to God’s ways. The chief priest orders Paul to be struck,
and Paul insults the chief priest right back.
Paul then accuses the chief priest of not obeying the Law. Those near Paul ask Paul if he really wants
to revile the high priest, and Paul immediately backtracks. The Bible says that we should not speak about
our leaders in an evil manner.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
I’ve
got to give some credit to the military leader.
He’s finally beginning to realize that there is something really deep at
stake. He rescued someone in the temple that
he thought was a criminal only to find out that he is a Roman citizen. Things aren’t what they originally appear and
he needs to do some investigation before he goes any further in determining a
punishment for Paul. So he orders the
Jewish leaders to assemble.
Why
is it almost always a good idea to get more information before taking a course
of action? {Unless, of course, you have all the information. Then a person just needs to act.}
Second Thought:
Paul
begins his defense by claiming to have kept God’s Law, which he had. The chief priest orders him to be struck,
demonstrating that the chief priest didn’t believe Paul’s claim. The chief priest acted upon a subjective understanding
of information rather than genuinely listening to Paul and the Holy Spirit.
Why
are human beings quick to jump to conclusions?
Why do we often act before we think?
We do people – especially leaders – have a tendency to think they know
what is right far more quickly than they should? What does this say about the need to take
time to discern as well as the need to respect those who do?
Third Thought:
Paul
calls the chief priest a “whitewashed tomb.”
This expression comes from the fact that people would often paint tombs
white in order to warn the living that they were approaching a place of the
dead. Since the living were supposed to
avoid contact with the dead in Jewish society, the whitewashing of the tomb
would enable people from approaching something that they shouldn’t. Thus, Paul is looking to the chief priest and
calling him a person who should be avoided because his theology and spiritual
leadership is dead. It’s a pretty harsh
critique.
Do
you think Paul is right in saying this?
What has led to the chief priest being closed minded and ignoring what
God is doing in the world?
Passage for Tomorrow: Acts 23:6-10