Luke 3:23-38
And Jesus
was Himself about thirty years while beginning, while being a son – as it was
being thought – of Joseph, of Heli, of Matthat, of Levi, of Melchi, of Jannai,
of Joseph, of Mattathias, of Amos, of Nahum, of Esli, of Naggai, of Maath, of
Semein, of Josech, of Joda, of Joanan, of Resa, of Zorobabel, of Salathiel, of
Neri, of Melchi, of Addi, of Cossam, of Elmadam, of Er, of Jesus, of Eliezer,
of Jorim, of Matthat, of Levi, of Simeon, of Judah, of Joseph, of Jonam, of
Eliakim, of Melea, of Menna, of Mattatha, of Nathan, of David, of Jesse, of
Obed, of Boaz, of Salah, of Na’asson, of Aminadab, of Admin, of Arni, of
Hezron, of Perez, of Judah, of Jacob, of Isaac, of Abraham, of Tarah, of
Nachor, of Serouch, of Ragau, of Palek, of Eber, of Salah, of Cainam, of
Arphaxad, of Sem, of Noah, of Lamech, of Methusala, of Enoch, of Jaret, of Maleleel,
of Cainam, of Enos, of Seth, of Adam, of God.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
As we open this passage, we get two very interesting
phrases. First of all, we hear that
Jesus was about thirty. I’ve often
wondered why Jesus waited until He was thirty before satisfying His
calling. I think the answer is really
simple. For Jesus to be taken seriously
as a genuine teacher of the faith, He needed to look the part. He’s God, so of course He could have done the
task at any age. But for the human
beings around Him to accept Him, Jesus would need to look like a person who had
lived long enough to have wisdom.
How does this show us that God is willing to meet human
ideals as misguided as they might be?
What ideals have you met in the past even though they truly weren’t
necessary to accomplish God’s will?
Second Thought:
The second interesting phrase is that we hear of Jesus being
a son of Joseph “as it was being thought.”
In other words, Luke is truly to subtly remind us that the world saw
Jesus as Joseph’s boy. But in reality, Jesus
was God’s Son. Luke is trying to subtly
remind us of this fact while also trying desperately to not offend Joseph or
minimize his role. Joseph was a good
man, chosen by God for this role. But
ultimately, Jesus was God’s Son.
Was does Luke’s skill in writing tell us about his purpose
of writing this book? How do you think
that Luke felt about Joseph? How do you
feel about Joseph?
Third Thought:
There are two genealogies in the
Bible. We studied one of them a while
ago in Matthew 1:1-17. Here we get Luke’s
version. What I really love about Luke’s
version is that he takes the genealogy all the way back to Adam. This really shows Luke’s eye for his audience. Matthew only went back to Abraham because
Matthew is writing predominantly to the Jews.
Matthew was proving Jesus’ Jewish heritage. However, Luke goes the whole way back
Adam. Luke isn’t interested in showing
why Jesus belongs to the Jews. Luke is
interested in showing why Jesus belonged to all creation. Jesus is the Son of God, descended from the
very being that God Himself made. Jesus
came to save all of creation.
Have you ever seen this passage as
proof that Jesus came to save the whole world?
Why is this an important fact to remember?
Passage for Tomorrow: Luke 4:1-2
No comments:
Post a Comment