Summary retelling of Acts 7: 35-38:
Again
Stephen brings in the idea that God’s redeemers are rejected by the people that
God wants to save. Stephen reminds us
that Moses did miracles in the presence of the Hebrew people in Egypt as well
as while they wandered through the desert.
Stephen reminds the Sanhedrin that Moses told the Hebrew people around
them that God will raise up from out of them another savior – a savior greater
than him! And of course, Stephen reminds
the Sanhedrin that it was Moses to whom God gave the law as a living document
for the Hebrew people to hear and follow – a law which pointed them to their
need for a Messiah.
Thoughts for Today:
First Thought:
My
first thought is likely going to be a continual “first thought” that is
applicable for every day until we finish Acts 7:50. So I’m going to keep it as a running
commentary until we get to verse 50.
Stephen
continues to demonstrate mastery over his religious heritage.
- Day one we see that Stephen was familiar enough with Abraham.
- Day two we see that Stephen is familiar enough with Joseph.
- Day three we see Stephen is familiar with Moses’ birth and the persecution of the Hebrew people in Egypt.
- Day four we hear how Moses interacts with his people and the initial failure he has.
- Day five we hear the burning bush incident retold and God’s calling for Moses.
- Day six we hear a brief summary of the exodus story and how Moses did miraculous things with the people in the wilderness
Why
is it important to realize that Stephen knows his religious history? What does knowing the religious history allow
Stephen to accomplish? Do you know the
religious history of the Old and New Testaments? If yes, how can/do you use it? If no, how can you learn it?
Second Thought:
Again
we return to this concept that the very people God wants to save are the ones
who reject the person that He sends into their midst. The people rejected Moses when he was acting
upon his own will, but they continue to reject Moses even as he acts upon God’s
will here. In spite of all the great and
tremendous things that Moses does among them, they still continue to reject
him. They want to do things their own
way and do things that benefit themselves.
In a sense, their motto was: “If we didn’t think of it and we can’t see
how it will give us the maximum benefit with the minimum effort, we’re not
interested.”
Are
you quick to judge the people God sends into your midst? Have you ever caught yourself saying, “That’s
too hard, I won’t even give it a try” when really it is what God wants? Why are we so prone to reject God in favor of
the desires of our own heart?
Third Thought:
Stephen
doesn’t spend much time directly talking about the giving of the Law – but he
does use a few very significant words to describe the process of Moses receiving
the Law. He calls that process “receiving
living oracles.” The word “receiving” is
important because it shows that it came from God, not Moses. The word “oracle” is important because it
tells us that the Law is considered a document full of profound wisdom and
warnings. The word “living” is important
because it reminds us that the Law always has a message – we can never learn
everything that it could possibly have to tell us. But perhaps most importantly, we need to
remember that it is the Law (and our inability to live up to it) that gives us
knowledge of how desperately we need Jesus Christ.
So
how much do you need Christ? Does your response
towards God reflect how much you need Him to save you?
Passage for Tomorrow: Acts 7:39-43
No comments:
Post a Comment