Matthew 27:24-26
And after Pilate saw that he is successful in accomplishing
nothing – but rather a riot became – after taking water he washed the hands
before the crowd while saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this one. You all will take responsibility for causing
this to happen.” And after answering the
whole crowd said, “His blood is upon us and upon our children.” At that time he released Barabbas to
them. And after flogging Jesus he handed
him over in order that He should be crucified.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
As we continue looking at Pilate, look at what Matthew tells
us about Pilate. Pilate realizes that he
is successful in accomplishing nothing.
Pilate realizes that there is nothing that can be done with this crowd. This affirms what we’ve been saying about
Pilate all along. If Pilate were in this
for the popularity, he wouldn’t be looking to change the opinion of the
crowd. Pilate is not in this for the
popularity. Pilate is seeking justice
but realizes that the crowd will not hear anything about it. So he does what he can. He washes his own hands of the incident and
places the guilt where it needs to rest: upon the people who are supposed to be
God’s people.
How do you feel about Pilate after reading this
passage? Why would Pilate capitulate to
the will of the crowd even though he is the authority? Does his capitulation change your opinion of
him?
Second Thought:
Once more we have another view of the crowd. This is an equally important side to the
crowd as we saw yesterday. Pilate could
do nothing with them. Yet yesterday we
saw that the crowd was easily lathered up into a rage by the religious
leaders. The crowd is responsible for
their decisions, even if they are thinking together in a mob mentality. The crowd knows what it wants – and usually
the crowd does not want logic, reason, and a reasonable conversation. The crowd wants action, drama, and
intensity. This is why the crowd responds
to call of the religious leaders to seek Jesus’ blood but they do not respond
to Pilate’s call for logic and reason.
The religious leaders may bear the guilt of manipulating the crowd, but
the crowd bears the guilt of allowing themselves to be manipulated by evil and
not listening to good.
Have you ever been in a place to see a crowd reject logic
and reason? Have you ever been in a
place to see a crowd respond to emotional appeal so much that no amount of
logic and reason could reach it? Why is
it best in such circumstances to simple walk away from the crowd at those
moments?
Third Thought:
Finally, notice that the crowd owns the
guilt. They welcome the guilt. They are so convinced of what they want in
the moment that they embrace the guilt of Jesus. We should learn this lesson, too. When we go along with the crowd, we had
better be sure that we trust the crowd to make the right decision. Crowds are notorious for being short-sighted and
thoughtless. After all, who embraces the
guilt for another person losing their life except people who are not thinking? Furthermore, in another ironic twist of fate
we can see just how much God is still in control. Who else could maneuver this situation in
such a way that the crowd not only calls out that they want Barabbas (Son of
the Father) to be released but also then maneuvers the crowd and the religious
people into a position of confessing their own guilt? The stubbornness of the people only leads us
into a position to seeing the presence of God so clearly.
Why do the people embrace their
guilt? How does their desire to embrace
their guilt actually demonstrate God’s omnipresence and omnipotence?
Passage for Tomorrow: Matthew 27:27-31
No comments:
Post a Comment