Summary retelling of Hebrews 8:8-9
We
can see God’s true perspective on the Law in the Old Testament (Jeremiah31:31-34). God says that there will be a
day coming when He will create a New Covenant with His people. This covenant will not be like the covenant
that He made with the Hebrew people when they came out of Egypt (IE, the
Law). They broke that covenant. They showed no regard for that covenant. Since they disregarded that covenant, God
disregarded them.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
It
is important to understand the role that the Old Testament plays in the
theology of Christ. It would be one
thing for us to say, “We believe Christ said this about the Old Testament,
therefore things changed.” But if that’s
all we did, then we’d be no better than someone who came along and said, “We
believe ____ said this about Christ’s words, therefore things have changed.” But if we can go back into the Old Testament
and illustrate how the Old Testament supports New Testament theology, we can
give New Testament theology a much more stable base. New Testament theology doesn’t become the
next “new thing on the block.” New
Testament theology becomes a fulfillment of the promises of the Old
Testament. Rather than it being
something new, it can be seen as a completion of the former.
When
you think about the two Testaments, do you think of them as separate entities? Do you think of them as something promoting a
uniform message? Or do you think of them
as two separate entities with a drastic change in the middle? Why do you think of them as you do?
Second Thought:
God
talks about a New Covenant. Remember how
the reading from yesterday ended? If the
first covenant was able to accomplish everything, why would we even need a
second covenant? Since this is God
telling us about His desire for a second covenant, we know that it had to have
been His plan all along. God knew that
the first covenant would not solve anything.
Rather the first covenant would teach us and prepare us to understand
why we need a second covenant. The first
covenant would set the example and demonstrate how broken we are. The second covenant would actually solve the
issues that the first covenant exposed.
How
does this “first covenant exposes our problems” while the “second covenant
solves our problems” approach help show how the Old and New Testaments are not
two different stories at all but one fluid story made up of two parts?
Third Thought:
God
is clear about the fact that the Hebrew people could not keep the first
covenant. For the record, that’s not a
polemical statement against Hebrew people.
The truth is that no human being regardless of race or creed or color
can keep the Law. But since it was given
to the Hebrew people, they are the “example” or the “test case.” They broke the first covenant. They exposed humanity’s inability to keep the
Law. They demonstrated the truth about
all of us: we all are in desperate need of a second covenant that we cannot
break.
How
are you guilty of breaking the first covenant?
In what ways do you not live up to God’s desire for your life?
Passage for
Tomorrow: Hebrews 8:10-13
No comments:
Post a Comment