Summary retelling of 1 Timothy 3:1-3
Paul
then talks to Timothy about religious oversight and those who wish to rise to
the position of overseeing the church.
The qualities that Paul lists are: above criticism, a husband of one
wife, able to think rationally, able to act civilly, modest, hospitable,
capable of teaching, not a drunkard, not violent, gentle, not someone who likes
to argue, not a lover of wealth.
Thoughts for Today
First Thought:
Paul
does make a point of talking about religious oversight. Before I jump into the list of
qualifications, it is worth talking about why Paul has this list. There are many people who seek to be in
power. Some of them legitimately seek to
be in control because God has called them to be there. Other people seek to be in control because
they like the feeling of being in control.
Others seek to be in control because they have a personal agenda that
they want to achieve. Some seek to be in
control simply to prevent someone else from having control. We’ve spoken frequently about the human flaw
of always wanting to be in control and how difficult it is for us to submit to
the authority of another (or even others).
This list is necessary for Paul to give because he knows that people –
especially the people in the church in Ephesus – love power.
Why
do people love power so much? Where in
your life do you have trouble releasing authority to another person or even to
God?
Second Thought:
The
word for “religious oversight” is the word “episkope” in the Greek. It is the word that our English
denominational name “Episcopal” comes from.
Sometimes it can mean “visit.”
However, by the time it is used in the New Testament it is usually taken
to mean “people who oversee through personal contact.” In many cases, it is assumed to be a position
of leadership in both authority as well as in service.
Why
is it important to have leaders who serve?
Why is it important to have servants who lead? What is the difference between those two
questions? Why is it important to
emphasize the visitation or personal contact nature of leadership?
Third Thought:
Let’s
look at Paul’s list really quickly. Many
of the items make sense. You don’t want
a leader to love wealth, because the goal of the church is to focus on God, not
getting rich. {Mind you, you don’t want to run the church into the ground
financially, either!} You don’t want
a person who is prone to getting drunk because you need to be able to rely on
your leaders to be able to make good, uninfluenced, and spiritual decisions any
time of the day. They need to be above
criticism because if they have obvious flaws upon which they are not working to
maintain or correct then nobody will trust their witness. The abilities to think rationally and act
civilly are obviously important – you don’t want leaders who fly off the handle
for no apparent reason. Modesty is
important because you don’t want leaders who are more interested in attracting
attention to themselves than they are interested in giving glory to God. Hospitality is obvious because you want
people who can make others feel welcome in the love of Christ. A person should be able to teach – after all,
why have a leader that has no ability to train other leaders? But the two that I think need the most
explanation are the “husband of one wife” and the “not someone who likes to
argue.” I’ll handle those in separate paragraphs
since this one is already long.
The
expression “husband of one wife” has always been debated. Literally, the Greek
says a “one woman man.” We must remember
that the Greek uses the same word for “woman” as it does for “wife” and the
same word for “husband” as it does “man.”
Thus, there are some people who try to use this passage to indicate that
a divorced person cannot lead, but we should understand that Paul is not
necessarily speaking about marriage.
Personally, I do not find it necessary to say that Paul is speaking
about a married couple. I believe that
Paul says this to make the distinction between monogamy and polygamy (or even
in the terms of dating – those who are dating one person versus those who are
dating multiple people). Thus, I don’t
think Paul is speaking about divorce at all in this passage; I think he is
speaking to the number of intimate relationships we are trying to maintain. The reason I believe this is because so much
of this list has to do with focus, loyalties, and personal agendas. Obviously, the more spouses a person has or
the more dating relationships a person is in, the more focus they will have to
give to their significant others and the less focus they will be able to give
to the needs of the church. I believe for
Paul this is a comment more on a person’s ability to be devoted to the work of
God and not a description about their status of divorce. {That
being said, I do think that Paul would have an issue with a divorced person who
desires to lead if the divorced person has not gone through the process of
confession, repentance, and reconciliation with God in order to receive genuine
forgiveness. As a church, we are about genuine
forgiveness and getting people to that point in their life.}
The
other qualification is “not someone who likes to argue.” I think this one is really important. There are some people who simply like to
argue because debating is fun. There are
some people who simply have a disposition to need to “stir the pot.” These are not people that should necessarily
be in leadership. It is good to be able
to debate and make sure that we see all the sides. However, we need to do so rationally as
church leaders. We need to be able to
make the best decision and move on. We
don’t need endless or fruitless debates.
Constructive discussion is great; arguing for the sake of arguing benefits
no group of leadership.
Having
gone through the list, which are the qualifications that you think shine
through you? Which are the qualifications
that you might stumble upon if you are not careful? Do you think everyone has a few of these
qualifications that they are weaker and a few that they won’t struggle with
ever?
Passage for
Tomorrow: 1 Timothy 3:4-7
No comments:
Post a Comment